The belief in god IS flawed reasoning from which everything else flows.
-----
Even if true, it can't be prooved via formal logic because "Beleif" has ZERO TRUTH VALUE.
-----


No god then there is no divine law, their vision of creation is wrong and so on and so forth.
------
The question is what makes the religion fall apart as a social organizer. In theory, somebody could generate a good god and then believing in it would be merely dumb and not actually harmful to the world.
The idea that there is no divine law also cannot be rationally prooved, ,and in fact the reverse; all a good arguer would have to
do is invoke the fractal scalar mathematics of the universe to show that there is a set of rules operating in the universe constantly
and point out that science actually doesn't have a good explanation for a large variety of cosmological constants.
Since i agree with you that there is no "divine law" but would argue from the other side that there are SUBTLE LAWS which
may appear invisible to the normal 5 senses, the problem here again is that your argument is from the universal rather than
the particular. You can't fault them for doing something every body does. The question is how their version ends up responsible
for exactly the pain and strife it was supposed to represent.

We are trying to look for CAUSE AND EFFECT here, not anything as simple as ASSIGNATION OF BLAME.
-----


The existence or non existence of god is fundamental to the whole system and since it is unevidenced and,
------
i suggest to you that the existence or non existence of god is a pre-occupation of yours personally, and is not really
that relevant to this thread. If god exists, god isn't Jewish, that is the logic that should suffice here.

Basing a argument against a religion based on the fact that it is a belief system is a hopeless endeavor. The question must
be what the religion is responsible for and how its behaviors played out over time. Actions speak louder than dogmas.
By their fruits shall ye know them.

The jewish culture and society is dystopic. Thats the crux of the matter; how their society and culture fails because of their
beliefs.
----------


indeed, in all the Abrahamic faiths contradicted and disproven (as preserved in their sacred texts) there's the problem right there. With Judaism you can extend the problem into very stark real world problems, their belief that the Messiah is yet to come is a prime cause for much of their persecution over the years and the belief that they are owed Israel and promised it is a massive cause of multigenerational conflict in the middle east. All predicated upon their belief in god.
-----
if you'd elaborate on the psychology of the messiah effect and how that ties into justification for unethical behavior, you'd have something
sunbstantial there.
---

The example you give of the belief in ownership of women, that is a religious flaw in many faiths perpetuated by their transmitted dogma and beliefs which derive from a belief in god - the fatal central flaw.
------
The example i give doesn't rest on an axiom which has no derivable truth value in formal logic. We can show that women being chattel slaves and being sold and bought like cattle is wrong and harmful from very easy base axioms that everybody sane can agree on.
We can show how even though they corrected it, it created a psychological wound in culture that carried all the way into the present
and into the current forms of sexual opressions and manifestations of sexual perversity.
------
-----


There are, perhaps, some good qualities in all of these faiths IF you can seperate the wheat from the chaff
-----
Thats the problem of doing this honestly, ,and that is what you must do if you are going to convince anybody that you aren't just full
of piss and vinegar. Attacking the old system is ludicrous unless you show how you would preserve what is good of it and integrate
that into a lucid ecelctic system that serves human needs and psychology.
-----

but the fatal flaw will continue to be passed on until you seperate them from god and judge and adapt them based upon your own conscience and not divine authority. In order to do that properly one must excise god.
-------
Let me give you your first real clue. Thats impossible. You can't convince people there is no god when there is a real
phenomenon that very approximately fits the bill. You simply cannot succeed because everybody knows theres something more
out there. What you can do is offer a lucid exploration of that which isn't steeped in political and economic evil.