What do you make of cases like this, where parents pray over children dying of easily treatable ailments?
www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/0...ap/index.html
I've heard pretty much universal condemnation from people of all kinds of faiths or lack thereof, but I have seen a few people in this tribe making generalized anti-science anti-medicine pro-faith-and-power-of-prayer statements suggesting essentially that science and medicine have hurt humanity and that we'd all be healthy and fine if we just aligned to the correct spiritual worldview.
So, what say you?
A) Are these parents wrong because religion is a fraud and should not be applied to life-or-death circumstances?
B) Are these parents wrong because religion, while a valid and useful thing, is no substitute for worldly medicine when it comes to this kind of thing?
C) Are these people on the right track but just practicing the wrong faith?
D) Are they totally in the right and who are we to question God's wisdom in taking their child?
E) Or is it that the question can be totally evaded by a couple of Bible quotes, an slight nitpicking historical side argument, hair splitting about whether 90+% of self-identified members of a religion are REALLY members of that religion and white-noise circular platitudes asserting that faith is love and love is faith and the divine is in all therefore all is divine?
So, what say you, dismissers of medical technology? Should these parents be prosecuted for what they did?
There is a bonus question to follow that one. See if you can anticipate it!
www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/0...ap/index.html
I've heard pretty much universal condemnation from people of all kinds of faiths or lack thereof, but I have seen a few people in this tribe making generalized anti-science anti-medicine pro-faith-and-power-of-prayer statements suggesting essentially that science and medicine have hurt humanity and that we'd all be healthy and fine if we just aligned to the correct spiritual worldview.
So, what say you?
A) Are these parents wrong because religion is a fraud and should not be applied to life-or-death circumstances?
B) Are these parents wrong because religion, while a valid and useful thing, is no substitute for worldly medicine when it comes to this kind of thing?
C) Are these people on the right track but just practicing the wrong faith?
D) Are they totally in the right and who are we to question God's wisdom in taking their child?
E) Or is it that the question can be totally evaded by a couple of Bible quotes, an slight nitpicking historical side argument, hair splitting about whether 90+% of self-identified members of a religion are REALLY members of that religion and white-noise circular platitudes asserting that faith is love and love is faith and the divine is in all therefore all is divine?
So, what say you, dismissers of medical technology? Should these parents be prosecuted for what they did?
There is a bonus question to follow that one. See if you can anticipate it!
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Tue, April 29, 2008 - 6:48 AMThis has already been discussed Jason,but thanks for bringing it to the forefront.
A few years back a Family who are practicing "Christian Scientist's" placed their five year old son in one of their customary "Prayer Circles" and on the fifth day,this little boy died from a "Simple Bowel Obstruction" (Torsion of the Bowel) by that point he was Vomiting his OWN FECES! and he died from "Sepsis" or complete poisioning of his body by contaminated Fecal matter that backed up from his bowels to his Esophagus! The cuase of death was: "aspiration on his own Feces" . "Torsion of the Bowel" is COMMON in children that age and can be medically treated by often a "simple Office Procedure" where a qualified Doctor "untwist's" the Bowel by manual physical means.
Christian Scientist's bemoan ALL medical Treatment and use "Prayer" to CURE themselves. Well NO "Prayer" can cure a Twisted Bowel,a Broken Arm,or Appendicitis and the Boys Grandmother(a "Former "Christian Scientist) SUED the Family for "wrongful death" of her Grandson. By the time the Court Case was "Over" Both Parents were convicted of "Premeditated Manslaughter" becuase anyone with half a BRAIN knows that "Prayer can console the Sick,but it cannot CURE the sick" especially of a Bowel Obstruction.
Currently Both Parents are "Serving Life Without Parole" in seperate State Prisons. The outcome of this trial sent a Shockwave through the entire Christian Scientist Faith and ushered in NEW Laws stating VERY CLEARLY that "If at the end of Only THREE DAYS in a Prayer Circle,any child under age 18 that is NOT physically better,MUST BE treated by a Doctor" IF that Child Dies becuase it was denied proper Medical Treatment,it's Parents will be held accountable for the Death of that Child!
If these Parents HAD taken their little boy into a Hospital within three days of his Bowel Obstruction he would have LIVED instead of dying a SLOW HORRIBLE death of Aspirating on his own Feces!
It's Ok for one to "Believe that Prayer can Cure" but if it doesn't you better damn WELL get that child to a qualified Doctor or "Face Life Without parole".
Do I think the sentence was "Fair"? ABSOLUTALLY! NO Child should ever have to die the way that little boy did.
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Tue, April 29, 2008 - 11:14 AMI was a student of Christian Science, 'till about college. So I will only speak for my experience vis-a-vis Christian Science.. not for the other religions or denominations that practice faith-based-healing.
Christian Science (CS) has precepts pertaining to healing the sick just as they do with healing sinl... CS sees healing sin and healing physical ailments as within the domain of possibilities, as demostrated by Jesus and his followers. As a student of CS, one is taught to gain aptitude is anything one does.that one does not become like Jesus without serious spritual work.
There are parents who obviously think they are prepared, or think others are prepared as CS healers, that they would risk the lives of their children, and their thought is proven to be invalid in the outcome they desired.
Most Christian Scientist I know, acknowledge the limit to their own healing abilities and follow a pragmatic approach..they seek help from the medical "art" and medical science to augment their own healing abilities.
But there are those who don't have this pragmatism and are in fact fanatics..who don't have a clear evaluation of their situation..and a few of them get into a group-think of this fanticism and you get this criminal result. -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Tue, April 29, 2008 - 11:38 AM!Alex!: "As a student of CS, one is taught to gain aptitude is anything one does. There are parents who obviously think they are prepared... and their thought is proven to be invalid in the outcome they desired."
I hope I have not misinterpreted your statement. Are you saying that prayer could have been the correct answer, but the parents did not have enough "aptitude" at prayer to accomplish the healing?
-
-
John 14:12
Tue, April 29, 2008 - 12:50 PM<<Are you saying that prayer could have been the correct answer, but the parents did not have enough "aptitude" at prayer to accomplish the healing?
>>
Changeling,
I appreciate your request for verification of what I said. (I'm not stating my personal opinion..just giving your the CS view, as I see it)
About half of what Christian Science deals with is exactly the principles for curing the sick--the healing works of Jesus and his disciples.
Christian Scientist interprets Jesus rather literaly :
John 14:12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do;
So according to Christian Scientist, yes it's a matter of aptitude in spiritual development for someone to be able to cure people of sickness.
Now, this aptitude is quite uncasual..it requires quite the transcendence of physics into metaphysical realms..and back again.
Christian Scientist could answer you thusly, "if you ask Jesus himself, if those parents simply needed more or alot more spiritual aptitude, he could very well say something as follows:
I will reapeat:
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do"
I hope this clarifies what i thought I expressed before.
Again, I am not giving you my personal opinion.. I am just giving you what I think to be the CS viewpoint, as i see it from being a former CS student. -
-
Re: John 14:12
Tue, April 29, 2008 - 1:17 PM> So according to Christian Scientist, yes it's a matter of aptitude in spiritual development for someone to be able to cure people of sickness.
Well and good if you want to heal yourself, but what right does anyone have to impose that ridiculous delusion on an innocent child who can be treated safely and easily with insulin? -
-
Re: John 14:12
Tue, April 29, 2008 - 1:41 PM<<impose that ridiculous delusion on an innocent child >>
I think I understand your viewpoint.. I suspect it stems from the assumption that prayer is not as effective and reliable as medical science.
I suspect that if metaphysical healing where proven objectively to be effective and reliable as medical science, most people would not see it as ridiculous or delusionary...and many outside the CS community may eventually prefer to take their innocent child for curings.
I believe there are some independent objective studies that look into this...
I don't remember what the conclusions where.. I suspect that it was lukewarm in favor of CS.
One fact that I remember is that the average lifespan of a Christian Scientist is slightly shorter than the average american... this was something I read back in the 80's when i was very young.. so maybe those figures are outdated. -
-
Re: John 14:12
Tue, April 29, 2008 - 2:20 PM> I suspect it stems from the assumption that prayer is not as effective and reliable as medical science.
Not assumption, conclusion based on multiple published studies showing that prayer has no effect on healing. Even if a measurable effect could be shown, it would pale in comparison to taking insulin, which is highly safe and effective.
Quinine is somewhat effective in preventing malaria. Quinine is much, much more effective at preventing malaria prayer is at curing diabetes. Yet no responsible physician today would recommend quinine to prevent malaria because Malarone is much, much more effective.
So, it matters precious little if some study somewhere showed that praying gives you a 1% advantage over not praying. No one is saying don't pray. Pray all you want. It's the withholding of insulin that is based on irresponsible delusion.
Prayer + insulin is better than prayer alone.
"I suspect that if metaphysical healing where proven objectively to be effective and reliable as medical science, most people would not see it as ridiculous or delusionary.."
Right, because that's the definition of "not a ridiculous delusion." If evidence shows that this medical intervention is safe and/or more effective than the standard intervention, then it should be utilized and researched.
But flat out it is not. You have a child there dying of diabetes. You are withholding insulin. You know that insulin will help. You do not know that prayer will help. You have an affirmative responsibility to administer insulin and failing to do to indulge your private fantasies about the universe in the face of substantial contradicting evidence is spiritual narcissism at best and psychopathy at worst.
This is one of the problems I have with religion. It puts "serving God" and "following your spiritual path" ahead of "relying on evidence" and "respecting the rights of others."
What responsibility could possibly compete with the mandates of a perfect God? How could anyone possibly invoke silly things like statistics and medical studies in the face of a faith so strong it would rather, ahem, WATCH ITS OWN CHILD DIE than admit its own error?
Faith may strengthen you when reason fails or is absent. But in the presence of reason, it is a poor guide to truth.
-
-
Re: John 14:12
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 11:52 AM>>"what right does anyone have to impose that ridiculous delusion on an innocent child"<<
I don't believe the state has any business dictating how people choose to live their lives. A family or group of people could decide to forgo all contact with our current technically advanced civilization, for any reason whatsoever and there is nothing wrong with this. It is not the state's businesss to tell people how to run their lives. The state cannot claim to own the children within families and should not be telling people what they must do with their own children. This overreaching of our government and society to control every aspect of our lives really sickens me. I don't agree with anyone's decision to not use modern medicine when there is a clear benefit, but I think they ought to have the right to make that decision. When you take that right away, the consequences are quite grim for all of us, so we need to be fighting against this idea at every turn. -
-
Re: John 14:12
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 5:54 PMOne of the valid function of government is to advocate for those who need an advocate in matters of life, limb and property.
The right of a parent to espouse a particular belief does not exceed the right of the child to survive and children cannot advocate for themselves. Government intervention may be a inelegant solution, but it is the best one we have at the moment.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Tue, April 29, 2008 - 12:04 PMMy maternal grandparents were both Christian Scientists - they lived into their 80's. My mom was something of a rebel, though - she married a doctor!
I think that people who want to opt out of the medical system should be allowed to. It's a valid choice. It is not child abuse to raise your children according to your own religious beliefs. -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Tue, April 29, 2008 - 1:19 PM> It is not child abuse to raise your children according to your own religious beliefs.
It most certainly is. Children are innocent and should not be indoctrinated into belief systems but rather presented with the information they need to make an informed choice.
But whatever your religious practice, you do not have the right to withhold medical treatment from a helpless child just because you believe something that is demonstrably false (ie that God is more effective than insulin at treating diabetes.)
What if your religion tells you to handle snakes? Should children be put in danger of deadly snakebite? -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Tue, April 29, 2008 - 4:44 PMI'll go with answer F:
Prayer in addition to whatever the doctors can do to make the kid better.
I know NOTHING about Christian Science but in my Christian mind, withholding medical treatment is criminal.
When I had my heart attack I prayed like I'd never prayed before and so did my wife and kids but I'm still taking all the medications that the docs prescribed. Absolutely prayer helped. It gave me strength and hope on the emotional front as it did my wife and kids. I of course could have refused any medical treatment and took my chances with prayer alone but I'm an adult and know that it could go either way. A child doesn't have that option. -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Tue, April 29, 2008 - 5:43 PM"Father, will you pray for my son? He's boxing in the third fight tonight."
"Yes, my child, but if he can punch it'll help!"
:) -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 6:08 AMI have AIDS IF I had relied soley on PRAYER I'd have been Dead as a Doornail by 1990!
YES Praying to your God of choice can "sooth your Soul" and bring you comfort in your time of need but to date Prayer alone has CURED NOTHING! NO Christian is Jesus Christ himself!
Christian Scientist's have been killing their own Children for Generations in their "Prayer Circles" Finally the LAW is on the side of that defensless Child!
If they DIE in a Prayer Circle... the Parent's WILL GET "Life Without Parole"!
A Child is Indoctrinated INTO a Faith he/she doesn't even have the CHOICE to get Medical help and LIVE that child is at the mercy of it's Parent's and the Parents SHOULD BE(and now ARE!) held accountable for their Child's Death at THEIR Hands. -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 10:17 AMI will preface by saying that I am no longer a Christian, but grew up as one, so I know a thing or two about Christianity.
Jake, you state "Prayer alone has CURED NOTHING!" Does this mean that you don't think Jesus healed the sick or his followers as written in the bible? -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 11:27 AMI specifically stated that "Ordinary Christians" are NOT Jesus Christ himself.
It is said Jesus cured the sick so I can assume without any evidence to disprove this statement that it was possibly the truth.
You and I cannot and never have "cured a sick person through Prayer".
We are not Jesus. -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 1:50 PMThere is significantly more evidence that David Copperfield made the Statue of Liberty disappear than there is that Josua bar Joseph healed anyone or even existed.
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 2:18 PMOK Jake, you seem to be open to the possibility that Jesus, himself can cure, how about his disciples? -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 2:21 PMI am Not a Christian Alex
so I believe nether Jesus or his Deciples existed becuase the only "Proof" of their existance is a Book of Verse written about them.
I said IF Jesus did in fact exist it was "Possible" that HE ALONE may have been able to cure a person of Disease.
Christian Scientist's are NOT Jesus,therefore they cannot possibly possess the same "powers" as Jesus Christ purportedly had. -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 3:39 PMI see where you are comming from Jake...thanks for clarifying for me.
I understand how you think "Prayer alone has CURED NOTHING!"
I'm personally skeptical of such claim. -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 3:47 PM> I'm personally skeptical of such claim.
As you should be. But there have been a number of studies that have investigated the efficacy of prayer and all have either failed to show any benefit or been shown to be flawed (usually by breaking the blind status...Christians just can't help spreading that good news.)
In any event, there can be no dispute whatsoever that, statistically speaking, medicine is much safer and more effective than relying on prayer. If you have to choose one, choose medicine. If you must pray as well, fine, but prayer absolutely is not a reasonable substitute for medical intervention, especially for well understood and highly treatable diseases like diabetes.
Take 100 kids with diabetes, give them insulin, 99 will be fine. The one who dies is not proof that medicine doesn't work.
Take 100 kids with diabetes, pray for them, 99 will die. The one who lives is not proof that prayer works. -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 5:23 PMMy personal opinion is that prayer and medicine are not mutually exclusive systems.
I personally have more confidence in medical science than any form of prayer...alot more confidence!
I do think it is plausible that prayer can heal, and if someone claims to have these abilities, I would be skeptical of such claims...
I am very skeptical of claims that Jesus did not exist.. I think he did, although I cannot prove it. Thusly, I believe that he did actually cured the ill, and I believe that Jesus educated how to heal, and that "ordinary" humans can learn to heal metaphysically. I have heard of shammanic healings and I am skeptical but I am skeptical that they did not heal. I think if any spiritual group christian or otherwise is very effective at healing, then the news would spread fast and it would already be widely accepted as fact. -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 6:55 PM!a: I personally have more confidence in medical science than any form of prayer...alot more confidence!... if someone claims to have these abilities, I would be skeptical of such claims... I think he did, although I cannot prove it...I have heard of shammanic healings and I am skeptical but I am skeptical that they did not heal...I think if any spiritual group christian or otherwise is very effective at healing, then the news would spread fast
You seem pretty skeptical about JC's existence and abilities. -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 7:13 PMSwarm,
I'm a bit confused as to how you can say "You seem pretty skeptical about JC's existence and abilities. " where I said "I am very skeptical of claims that Jesus did not exist.. "..
Nevertheless, I am not a Christian..anymore..although I am not sure I disagree with any of his teachings...
-
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 7:16 PM> My personal opinion is that prayer and medicine are not mutually exclusive systems.
Of course they're not. Medicine and prayer together work about as well as medicine alone, therefore they are compatible.
There are a number of other activities that are not mutually exclusive to medicine, including:
whistling
stamp collecting
chewing bubble gum
knitting
Doesn't mean those things cure disease. -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Wed, April 30, 2008 - 7:21 PM> My personal opinion is that prayer and medicine are not mutually exclusive systems.
I said that in reference to the title of the post -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 10:26 AMI am a scientist.
I am a Christian.
I do not believe that God is against the use of medicine.
God was the first to put a man under in order to save him from pain whilst performing a surgical operation.
God answers the prayers of the righteous, but that doesn't mean the answer will always be yes. The answer can be no, not yet, or this is a growing moment for all involved.
For anyone to think that God is required to give us everything we want or ask for, immediately no less, is downright egotistical and stupid. Is a Christian allowed to use medicine? Yes. Does this negate the power or prayer? No. We pray for health to be restored. We pray for a surgeons hand to be sure. We pray for hearts to be healed and adversity to be overcome. The power of a person's will to survive can negate medicine, this you cannot doubt. If a person no longer wishes to live, modern medicine can do everything within it's power to no avail. Does this automatically mean that medicine is a lie? I don't see anyone jumping on that bandwagon in here.
I will never understand the people who live in black and white worlds. Maybe it isn't for me to understand these extremists. As long as they leave me alone and live in their own man-created misery, fine by me. -
-
Re: Prayer or medicine?
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 3:08 PMEther was the first Chemical Compound used to put the first Man "under Anesthesia" to eliminate pain during surgery.
It was discovered by Spanish Chemist Raymundus Lullius in 1275
How are we to be ceartain that "God was the first to put a Man under in order to save him from pain whilst performing a surgical operation"?
Can you provide Proof of this? -
-
This post was deleted by Changeling
-
-
God was the first Doctor?
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 5:49 PMWendy, what are you refering to when you said <<God was the first to put a man under in order to save him from pain whilst performing a surgical operation. >>
-
-
This post was deleted by Changeling?
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 5:50 PMwhat where some postings deleted, Changeling?
-
This post was deleted by Changeling
-
-
Re: God was the first Doctor?
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 6:12 PMWendy: "This was in reference to Genesis, where God noticed that it wasn't good for Adam to be alone, so He put Adam to sleep and removed a rib from him to make Eve. According to the story, this was to make an equal entity to help Adam in the care taking of Eden. This was all I was referring to."
The rest of the post was just more whining and talking about Jake. But Wendy, I'm not your editor. Leave out the attacks if you want your posts to remain.
-
Re: God was the first Doctor?
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 6:30 PM<<wanting proof of this or that>>
I think there are skeptics who do not WANT proof because I they do not want to believe in the first place..
I think ther are skeptics who WANT proof before accepting a claim that does not make sense to them.. and this is reasonable, don't you think? -
-
Re: God was the first Doctor?
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 7:13 PMThank You Alex
Skeptics? yes that would be Me.
I see nothing wrong in wanting "proof" and something other than Biblical Scripture. -
-
Re: God was the first Doctor?
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 7:34 PMWell Jake, the bible is a document of certain evidences..I would be skeptical of the claim that it is no "proof" of anything.
I am a skeptic also.. but I do not deny plausibility and deny me some utility. -
-
Re: God was the first Doctor?
Fri, May 2, 2008 - 5:48 AM!A: the bible is a document of certain evidences.
No, the bible is just evidence of itself, a book. It is no more evidence of its contents than Issac Asimov's books are evidence of the Foundation or "Ivanhoe" is evidence of any one named Ivanhoe.
It is at best historical fiction, with the emphasis on fiction.
-
-
-
Re: God was the first Doctor?
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 7:35 PM!a: because I they do not want to believe in the first place..
Then they aren't skeptics. -
-
Re: God was the first Doctor?
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 8:06 PMThe Only concrete "proof" in the Scriptures contained in The Holy Bible is,that a "Book" was written about a mysterious unseen God and Events that supposedly happened involving this God during the Bronze Age.
A Book written about something no human has ever seen is proof of nothing.
-
Re: God was the first Doctor?
Thu, May 1, 2008 - 10:47 PMskep·tic n.:
1. One who instinctively or habitually doubts, questions, or disagrees with assertions or generally accepted conclusions.
There are plenty of people who question doubt or disagrees simply because they do not want to accept conclusions or assertions...and be skeptics.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
